2.8 ELECTROSTATICS OF CONDUCTORS

Conductors and insulators were described briefly in Chapter 1. Conductors contain mobile charge carriers. In metallic conductors, these charge carriers are electrons. In a metal, the outer (valence) electrons part away from their atoms and are free to move. These electrons are free within the metal but not free to leave the metal. The free electrons form a kind of ‘gas’; they collide with each other and with the ions, and move randomly in different directions. In an external electric field, they drift against the direction of the field. The positive ions made up of the nuclei and the bound electrons remain held in their fixed positions. In electrolytic conductors, the charge carriers are both positive and negative ions; but the situation in this case is more involved – the movement of the charge carriers is affected both by the external electric field as also by the so-called chemical forces (see Chapter 3). We shall restrict our discussion to metallic solid conductors. Let us note important results regarding electrostatics of conductors.

  1. Inside a conductor, electrostatic field is zero
    Consider a conductor, neutral or charged. There may also be an external electrostatic field. In the static situation, when there is no current inside or on the surface of the conductor, the electric field is zero everywhere inside the conductor. This fact can be taken as the defining property of a conductor. A conductor has free electrons. As long as electric field is not zero, the free charge carriers would experience force and drift. In the static situation, the free charges have so distributed themselves that the electric field is zero everywhere inside. Electrostatic field is zero inside a conductor.
  2. At the surface of a charged conductor, electrostatic field must be normal to the surface at every point
    If \( \mathbf{E} \) were not normal to the surface, it would have some non-zero component along the surface. Free charges on the surface of the conductor would then experience force and move. In the static situation, therefore, \( \mathbf{E} \) should have no tangential component. Thus electrostatic field at the surface of a charged conductor must be normal to the surface at every point. (For a conductor without any surface charge density, field is zero even at the surface.) See result 5.
  3. The interior of a conductor can have no excess charge in the static situation
    A neutral conductor has equal amounts of positive and negative charges in every small volume or surface element. When the conductor is charged, the excess charge can reside only on the surface in the static situation. This follows from the Gauss’s law. Consider any arbitrary volume element \( v \) inside a conductor. On the closed surface \( S \) bounding the volume element \( v \), electrostatic field is zero. Thus the total electric flux through \( S \) is zero. Hence, by Gauss’s law, there is no net charge enclosed by \( S \). But the surface \( S \) can be made as small as you like, i.e., the volume \( v \) can be made vanishingly small. This means there is no net charge at any point inside the conductor, and any excess charge must reside at the surface.
  4. Electrostatic potential is constant throughout the volume of the conductor and has the same value (as inside) on its surface
    This follows from results 1 and 2 above. Since \( E=0 \) inside the conductor and has no tangential component on the surface, no work is done in moving a small test charge within the conductor and on its surface. That is, there is no potential difference between any two points inside or on the surface of the conductor. Hence, the result. If the conductor is charged, electric field normal to the surface exists; this means potential will be different for the surface and a point just outside the surface.
    In a system of conductors of arbitrary size, shape and charge configuration, each conductor is characterised by a constant value of potential, but this constant may differ from one conductor to the other.
  5. Electric field at the surface of a charged conductor

    \[ \mathbf{E}=\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_{0}} \hat{\mathbf{n}} \] (2.35)

    where \( \sigma \) is the surface charge density and \( \hat{\mathbf{n}} \) is a unit vector normal to the surface in the outward direction.
    To derive the result, choose a pill box (a short cylinder) as the Gaussian surface about any point P on the surface, as shown in Fig. 2.17. The pill box is partly inside and partly outside the surface of the conductor. It has a small area of cross section d S and negligible height.
    2.17

    The Gaussian surface (a pill box) chosen to derive Eq. (2.35) for electric field at the surface of a charged conductor.
    Just inside the surface, the electrostatic field is zero; just outside, the field is normal to the surface with magnitude \( E \). Thus, the contribution to the total flux through the pill box comes only from the outside (circular) cross-section of the pill box. This equals \( ±E\delta S \) (positive for \( \sigma > 0 \), negative for \( \sigma < 0 \)), since over the small area \( \delta S \), \( \mathbf{E} \) may be considered constant and \( \mathbf{E} \) and \( \delta S \) are parallel or antiparallel. The charge enclosed by the pill box is \( \sigma \delta S \).

    By Gauss’s law \[ E \delta S=\frac{|\sigma| \delta S}{\varepsilon_{0}} \]

    \[ E =\frac{|\sigma|}{\varepsilon_{0}} \] (2.36)

    Including the fact that electric field is normal to the surface, we get the vector relation, Eq. (2.35), which is true for both signs of \( \sigma \). For \( \sigma > 0 \), electric field is normal to the surface outward; for \( \sigma < 0 \), electric field is normal to the surface inward.
  6. Electrostatic shielding
    Consider a conductor with a cavity, with no charges inside the cavity. A remarkable result is that the electric field inside the cavity is zero, whatever be the size and shape of the cavity and whatever be the charge on the conductor and the external fields in which it might be placed. We have proved a simple case of this result already: the electric field inside a charged spherical shell is zero. The proof of the result for the shell makes use of the spherical symmetry of the shell (see Chapter 1). But the vanishing of electric field in the (charge-free) cavity of a conductor is, as mentioned above, a very general result. A related result is that even if the conductor is charged or charges are induced on a neutral conductor by an external field, all charges reside only on the outer surface of a conductor with cavity.
    2.18

    The electric field inside a cavity of any conductor is zero. All charges reside only on the outer surface of a conductor with cavity. (There are no charges placed in the cavity.)
    The proofs of the results noted in Fig. 2.18 are omitted here, but we note their important implication. Whatever be the charge and field configuration outside, any cavity in a conductor remains shielded from outside electric influence: the field inside the cavity is always zero. This is known as electrostatic shielding. The effect can be made use of in protecting sensitive instruments from outside electrical influence. Figure 2.19 gives a summary of the important electrostatic properties of a conductor.
    2.19

    Some important electrostatic properties of a conductor.

Example 2.7

  1. A comb run through one’s dry hair attracts small bits of paper. Why?
    What happens if the hair is wet or if it is a rainy day? (Remember, a paper does not conduct electricity.)
  2. Ordinary rubber is an insulator. But special rubber tyres of aircraft are made slightly conducting. Why is this necessary?
  3. Vehicles carrying inflammable materials usually have metallic ropes touching the ground during motion. Why?
  4. A bird perches on a bare high power line, and nothing happens to the bird. A man standing on the ground touches the same line and gets a fatal shock. Why?

VIEW SOLUTION

  1. This is because the comb gets charged by friction. The molecules in the paper gets polarised by the charged comb, resulting in a net force of attraction. If the hair is wet, or if it is rainy day, friction between hair and the comb reduces. The comb does not get charged and thus it will not attract small bits of paper.
  2. To enable them to conduct charge (produced by friction) to the ground; as too much of static electricity accumulated may result in spark and result in fire.
  3. Reason similar to (b).
  4. Current passes only when there is difference in potential.

Next Section ->